Phhhhhhheeeewwww….
What was that? Could it be? A sigh of relief? Maybe…
I don’t know if it’s just the weather (gorgeous) or all the final performances/projects/events going on around me, but all of a sudden it’s spring, undeniably spring. Even an avowed grump like myself can’t trundle on quite as grumpy and stressed out as before. Bind Their Wombs wrapped up with a sold-out final performance on Saturday (more when I get the pictures!). The trees outside FPH are getting their bloom on. And on Friday I went for a barefoot walk at the Hampshire Farm and saw a mass of second-year bullfrog tadpoles and a very excited flock of White Throated Sparrows.
The sparrows shouldn’t be that much of a surprise – they winter in Massachusetts – but both they and I have been cold and reclusive for months, and anyway I’ve never seen quite as many of them altogether as I did on Friday – there must have been fifty at least in the brush between the tomato fields and the cow pasture. Along with the song sparrows, white throats were pretty much the first sparrows I learned to pick out from the lumpy subcategory of “little brown birds.” They’re bigger than house sparrows, and their striped heads and bright yellow nares make them an easy spot once you know what you’re looking for. Also, they’re just uncommon enough in the places I tend to walk that every time I see one I get a little thrill, something like doing laundry and finding five dollars that I’d forgotten in the pocket of my jeans. They make me feel lucky. Hope a thing with feathers, etc. Someday soon, when I’m done with all this – and I’ll be working until at least the afternoon of May 6th – I have to get myself up to Mt. Holyoke and go birding.
Finished up my Div 3 retrospective last Wednesday. The idea of the retro is to reflect on the process of your project, recapitulate what you did, identify what problems emerged, the things you’re proud of and the things you need to work on. The actual requirements vary from Committee to Committee. Action Deb told me to write something informal to remind her of what exactly I’ve done this year so she can include everything in my final evaluation; my friends Joe and Pete are writing more involved artists’ statements, of which I am jealous and which I plan to do myself when I have a little more time. Still, all this retrospecting got me to thinking about Higher Education (it doesn’t take much to get me thinking about ‘higher education’), so it was amusing to me to read Mark Taylor’s op-ed in the New York Times about The End of Universities as We Know Them. He’s talking about grad school, of course, but many of his points about the structure of teaching and learning in your typical institutions of higher learning are the same ones that Hampshire faculty and administration are always pointing to when they try and explain how different and valuable the Hampshire education is. Our system hinges on direct interaction between undergrads and their faculty – we have no web of graduate students and teaching assistants propping up the system. [Instead, we have visiting professors and an overworked faculty. What can I say - you can’t have everything…] We’re already heavily invested in institutional collaboration; honestly, we couldn’t exist without the Five College Consortium – we’re practically the parasitic orchid sprouting from the better-funded resources of Smith and Amherst. Our professors don’t have tenure, interdisciplinarity is built into our academic structure, and Div 3s (structured as “mini-dissertations”) often take untraditional forms. We have our own problems (MANY of them. Don’t even get me started on what they’re doing to the office of Residential Life next year…), and as an institution we waste a lot of time and energy designing programs and “improvements” to the curriculum/school structure that generally end in disappointing compromise and wasted money. I don’t think Taylor knows quite the organizational mess he’s getting himself in to when he talks about replacing departments with flexible programs. But still – I love my school, and it’s a kick to see someone arguing for a more Hampshiresque mainstream in education, at least at the graduate level.
I would argue with (or add to?) Taylor’s article that not only are graduate students being trained to do jobs that aren’t available (jobs as university faculty) but also that the whole concept of higher education as a career path – as a single “field” – is untenable. I might be committing treason here: as the daughter (And niece. And granddaughter…) of academics and as a soon-to-be college graduate, I owe a hell of a lot to the institution of American higher education. I wouldn’t for a second argue that colleges and universities are outdated, or even that they’re quite as removed from the world as some (whoever finds it convenient at the time to talk about how incurably cloistered academia is – ahem, FOX News) would have you believe. There’s certainly been a lot of changes in education “as we know it” in the last thirty years. But just as there is much criticism of business schools (and, to a lesser degree, other career-track educational fields) for turning out graduates with no breadth of knowledge and no skills in critical thinking, I think we could – I think we need – to be more critical of how the current system of graduate schools and universities allows (hell – encourages) those widely read critical thinkers to go straight into grad school, specialize, then spend the next thirty years frantically publishing and teaching and arguing about the structure of higher education. I’ve got a lot more to say about that than I have space or time (that old excuse), but in short…In CalTech’s commencement address last year, Radiolab’s Robert Krulwich made a plea to scientists: that they do their best to explain what they do in plain language, to the average unscientific listener, because (he says) the other side, the religious luddites, sure do, and it’s important for the ordinary people without advanced degrees to get both sides of the story. (I’m paraphrasing badly – to hear the address, search WNYC for the show ‘Tell Me a Story’). In the humanities, I think the opposite is true: we need to free ourselves from advanced degrees. The greatest advantage graduate school bestows upon its suppliants is the academic community, a place where ideas and opinions are supported and refined, where (ideally) students are constantly exposed to new ideas and opinions. Why can’t this kind of community be created outside the confines of an institution? I don’t know. I’ll get back to you…
And with that…phew…back to work. In case you were interested, here’s that rough draft of my retrospective. I really want to expand the middle part into something like an artist’s statement on how fiction is inherently empathetic and cross-cultural, but I’ll save that until I have time to breathe. The original had footnotes. I’ve put some of them in brackets, but I’m not pleased about the change. [It’s just less classy…]
Sixteen months. Four of them writing…
Read the rest of this entry »